Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels remains an ever-popular work, represented in literature, film, on stage, on radio, and in art. Adapted frequently since its conception, the work presents a kind of satire on issues that remain relevant throughout history: a skepticism of science and pseudo-science, on the justness of rulers, and on moral standards.
Adam Roberts’ Swiftly takes this satire and investigates it in a far more literal, and long-term way. The Lilliputians have been enslaved and are factory workers, the Brobdingnagians have been recruited by the French to help them invade England. By adapting Gulliver’s Travels in this way, Roberts puts a more realist spin on Swift’s satire. Realism itself as a genre doesn’t inherently disable social commentary or satire. However, Roberts largely takes the sting out of Swift’s satire in his attempts to contextualize the various societies: because Swift largely presented the societies he introduces and placed his focus on their elements that leant themselves to satire, the text’s apt observations and commentary were preserved. Roberts, however, takes these images and attempts to contextualize them, treating them as real subjects, rather than treating them as devices to deliver a particular perspective.
In this transition, Roberts brings a fresh view to Swift’s original work: he introduces a human context and elements into a largely satirical and political text, humanizing it in the process. By explicating Swift’s world as he does, do you think that he strikes a balance between presenting a “real world” kind of perspective and presenting a satirical one?